Quick Answer: Formative Digital's AI Competitor Analysis shows you exactly what ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews say about your competitors, which sources earn them those citations, and the gap to you. You receive a written competitor gap report and a prioritized roadmap, delivered free inside seven business days. It profiles your competitors, not your own domain. Brantford-headquartered, serving Ontario and Canada-wide.
Matt Griffin, Formative Digital: "Owners do not ask me whether they are visible in AI search. They ask why their competitor keeps coming up and they do not. That is a different question, and it has a precise answer. The engines cite specific sources. We pull the exact source ChatGPT used to recommend your rival, the one Perplexity used, the one Gemini used, and we show you where you are absent. It is not a mystery. It is a list of doors you are not standing in."
What the AI Competitor Analysis delivers
One written competitor gap report, built from four measurements aimed at your rivals rather than at you. This is a diagnostic deliverable, not a retainer. You keep the report whether or not you ever work with us again. The whole engagement runs under Vector 1, Diagnose, pointed outward at the competitive field.
- Each competitor's citation rate, per engine. We run the buyer prompts that lead to a sale in your category against ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google Gemini, and Google AI Overviews, and record how often each engine names each of your competitors. This is the field reading: who the machines actually recommend, engine by engine, not who you assume is ahead.
- The source behind every competitor citation. For each engine, we capture the exact domain it grounded on when it named your rival: the directory, the review platform, the Knowledge Graph entry, their own page. This is the part a single screenshot never shows. It is the difference between knowing a competitor is winning and knowing the specific door they walked through to win.
- The consensus gap on your category. Because the four engines read largely different sources, a competitor can own one engine and be invisible in another. We report where that split falls for your category, so you can see whether a rival's lead is broad or concentrated in one engine you could contest.
- Your position, beside theirs, and the roadmap to close it. We place your own citation rate next to each competitor's and map every gap to the 12 Vectors, ranked by effort against impact. The roadmap is the bridge from this snapshot to actual work: which sources to earn, which signals to build, and in what order.
Your competitors, not your own domain: how this differs from the audit
This service and the AI Visibility Audit use the same four-engine instruments, but they point them at different subjects. The distinction matters because it changes the question being answered.
Two diagnostics, two subjects
- AI Visibility Audit: the subject is you. It measures your own citation rate per engine, reads your schema and entity signals, and tells you what to fix on your side. The question it answers is "where do I stand?"
- AI Competitor Analysis (this service): the subject is your rivals. It measures which competitors the engines cite, the source domains earning them those citations, and the exact gap between their visibility and yours. The question it answers is "who is beating me, where, and why?"
The two pair naturally. Run the audit first to fix your own baseline, then run this to map the field around you and decide which competitor's position is worth contesting first. Neither replaces the other; the audit looks in the mirror, this one looks across the street.
Why your competitor gets cited and you do not
The common assumption is that a cited competitor is simply bigger or better known. Often they are not. They are present in the one source a given engine happened to ground on, and you are absent from it. And the sources differ sharply by engine, which is the finding that makes this analysis worth running.
The consensus gap (Formative Digital first-party data)
- 1,732 AI-engine citations analyzed across nine Ontario cities, five verticals, and four engines (DataForSEO scrape, May 2026).
- 83.7% of every cited source was unique to a single engine. Only 16.3% of cited domains appeared in two or more engines. ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity are reading largely different webs.
- What this means for you: a competitor can dominate Perplexity through HomeStars and BBB listings while being absent from ChatGPT, which leaned heavily on its own Google grounding layer in our sample. The engine that recommends your rival is a fact, not a feeling, and so is the source behind it.
First-party analysis of a public-web citation scrape; figures describe the sampled Ontario query set and are not a guarantee of any individual result.
Independent studies point the same way. Search Engine Land reports that ChatGPT citations concentrate among a small group of domains, and work on the citation gap finds that AI engines routinely recommend a buyer's competitor while ignoring the buyer, for reasons that come down to source presence rather than quality. The analysis turns that pattern into a named list: the exact sources your rivals occupy and you do not.
Who this analysis is for
Best fit
- Ontario owners who keep seeing a specific competitor named by ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Gemini and want to know precisely why, and what it would take to displace them.
- Businesses preparing a budget case who need to show a decision-maker the concrete gap between a named competitor's citation rate and their own, across all four engines, not just one.
- Marketing leads in competitive categories (trades, professional firms, health, retail, hospitality) where a rival's AI visibility is actively costing them inbound enquiries.
- Owners who suspect a competitor's recent content push moved the engines and want it confirmed with evidence before they react.
Not the right fit if
- You only want your own baseline read. That is the AI Visibility Audit, which assesses your domain rather than your competitors. This service is the outward-facing counterpart.
- You expect the analysis alone to displace a competitor. It measures and prioritizes the field; it does not implement. Taking the position is execution work that follows the report.
- You want continuous tracking of competitor movement week over week. That is ongoing AI Citation Monitoring. This analysis is a single competitive snapshot by design.
Why this beats typing your rival's name into ChatGPT once
Anyone can ask ChatGPT "who are the best plumbers in my city" and read which competitor it names. That is an anecdote from one engine on one day. Two structural choices separate this analysis from that screenshot.
What makes the competitive read trustworthy
- Four engines, with the source attached. Because 83.7% of cited sources are unique to a single engine, a one-engine check misreads the field badly: it can show a rival dominating when they hold only one of four surfaces. We score all four and attach the exact domain behind each citation, so you see not just who is cited but the specific source you would have to enter to contest them.
- A real competitor set and a Vector-mapped roadmap. We profile three named competitors and turn every gap into a prioritized plan tied to the 12 Vectors, so the output is something you can act on this quarter, not a chart that tells you you are behind. You can audit the reasoning, not just accept a verdict.
Because the same 12-Vector methodology that scores the gap is the framework we use to close it, the roadmap is directly actionable: the specific sources and signals your situation needs, in priority order. You can read the framework in full at the 12 Vectors overview.
Proof: where closing the gap can lead
Mattress Miracle, Brantford ON
- Monthly organic visits: roughly 1,000 to 82,400 (SEMrush snapshot, April 2026).
- Newly ranked keywords in one 30-day window: approximately 25,000.
- Where it started: a diagnostic that named the gaps to the competitors winning the category, then a roadmap executed against them. This analysis is the same kind of starting point, aimed at your competitive field.
One client, one engagement, real numbers. This is a retail result and not a financial, medical, or legal claim. The analysis itself does not produce traffic; it measures the field and prioritizes. Outcomes from later work vary by industry, competition, and starting position, and results like these are not typical or guaranteed.
What it costs and what comes next
The AI Competitor Analysis itself is delivered free, as a no-obligation diagnostic. There is no tier to choose for the analysis. The tiers apply only if you decide to act on the roadmap with us afterward.
Where the analysis sits relative to the service tiers
- The analysis: free, one-time, no card required. You receive the competitor gap report and roadmap and owe us nothing.
- If you proceed (Starter / Growth / Dominance): the roadmap feeds directly into a tiered engagement, scaled to engine coverage and monthly output. Full pricing is at /pricing/, month-to-month, no lock-in, written cancellation clause.
- The Results Guarantee applies on any ongoing engagement on an existing domain: if your domain shows no measurable organic search results after 12 months, we work for free until you see them.
No lock-in on any tier. See full pricing.
Want to know why the engines keep naming your competitor?
The AI Competitor Analysis answers that with a written, four-engine gap report on the three rivals you name, with the source domain behind every citation. No cost. No obligation. You keep the roadmap whether or not you continue with us.
How we run the analysis (engineering view)
The honest version of "what does competitor analysis actually measure." We do not say "we will study your competitors." We name each measurement and the signal it reads, pointed at the competitive set.
- Competitor set definition: we confirm the three rivals to profile, or identify the businesses the engines actually treat as your competitors for your buyer prompts, which is frequently a different set than the ones you track yourself.
- Buyer-prompt construction: we build the real decision prompts for your category and location, the "best {your category} in {your city}" and problem-led questions, so the read reflects the queries that precede a purchase rather than brand-name lookups.
- Multi-engine competitor sampling (Vector 1, Diagnose): each prompt is run against ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews, recording which competitor is named, the position they hold inside the answer, and how often.
- Source extraction per citation: for every competitor mention we capture the cited domain, the directory, review platform, Knowledge Graph entry, or page each engine grounded on, because that source is the thing you would have to enter to contest the position.
- Consensus-gap read: we measure how concentrated or split each competitor's lead is across the four engines for your category, drawing on the same first-party method behind our 83.7% unique-source finding.
- Gap synthesis (Vector 2, Anchor and Vector 6, Structure): we compare your entity and schema signals against the cited competitors', then map every gap to its Vector and rank it by impact against effort, producing the prioritized plan you keep.
If you move from this one-time competitive read into watching the field over time, those same per-competitor metrics become tracked signals inside AI Citation Monitoring. The analysis defines the competitive baseline; monitoring watches it move.
How to get started
One step: book the free analysis. We agree the competitor set and prompt list on a short kickoff call, run the four-engine read across your rivals, and deliver the written competitor gap report inside seven business days. You decide from there. No sales-pressure follow-up. No dark-pattern email sequences. If the report shows the gap is small enough to close yourself, we tell you that plainly.
Matt Griffin, Formative Digital: "Truth, not tricks. The competitive read is honest because the source is the source: either the engine pulled your rival from that directory or it did not. We hand you the named list and the plan. Whether you walk through those doors with us or on your own is your call."
The analysis measures a point in time. AI engines update their grounding sources continually, so a competitive snapshot ages; treat it as a baseline, not a permanent verdict. Any outcome from acting on the roadmap depends on industry, competition, and your existing digital presence, and past results for our clients do not guarantee identical ones.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is AI competitor analysis?
AI competitor analysis is a diagnostic that measures what ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google Gemini, and Google AI Overviews actually say about your competitors when buyers ask the questions that lead to a sale. We run those prompts, record which competitors each engine names, capture the exact sources that earn them the citation, and report the gap between their visibility and yours. The output is a written competitor gap report, not a single screenshot. It tells you who the engines recommend, why, and what you would have to be present in to displace them.
How is this different from the AI Visibility Audit?
The subject is different. The AI Visibility Audit assesses your own visibility: your citation rate per engine and what to fix on your side. AI Competitor Analysis points the same instruments at your competitors: which of them the engines cite, the source domains behind each citation, and the exact gap you would need to close to take that position. The audit answers where do I stand; this answers who is beating me, where, and why. Many owners run the audit first for their own baseline, then this to map the competitive field around it.
Why do my competitors get cited by ChatGPT and I do not?
Usually because they are present in the specific sources a given engine grounds on, and you are not. The sources differ sharply by engine. Our May 2026 analysis of 1,732 AI-engine citations across nine Ontario cities found that 83.7% of every cited source was unique to a single engine, meaning ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity are reading largely different webs. A competitor can dominate Perplexity through HomeStars and BBB listings while being invisible in ChatGPT, or the reverse. The analysis shows you the exact source each engine pulled your competitor from, so the fix targets that source rather than a guess.
Which engines and how many competitors do you analyze?
We analyze four engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. We profile the three competitors you name, or help you identify the right three if you are not sure who the engines treat as your rivals, which is often a different set than the ones you watch in the parking lot. For each competitor and engine we record citation frequency, the position they hold inside the answer, and the source domains behind it, so the gap is specific rather than a general sense that they are ahead.
What do I actually receive, and how soon?
A written competitor gap report, delivered inside seven business days of the kickoff call. It contains each competitor's citation rate across all four engines, the exact source domains earning them those citations, the consensus gap between engines on your category, your own position beside theirs, and a prioritized roadmap mapped to the 12 Vectors showing which sources and signals to close first. The roadmap is yours to keep and act on, with us or with your own team.
What does AI competitor analysis cost?
The competitor analysis itself is delivered free, as a no-obligation diagnostic, the same as our AI Visibility Audit. There is no tier to choose for the analysis. The published tiers, Starter, Growth, and Dominance at /pricing/, apply only if you decide to act on the roadmap with us afterward, month-to-month, no lock-in, written cancellation clause. The Results Guarantee applies to any ongoing engagement on an existing domain: no measurable organic search results after 12 months and we work for free until you see them.
Why run this with Formative Digital specifically?
Two reasons. First, we measure four engines against a named competitor set and show you the source domains behind every citation, so you see precisely why an engine prefers your rival rather than just that it does. That grounding comes from the same first-party scrape behind our finding that 83.7% of cited sources are unique to one engine. Second, the same 12-Vector methodology that scores the gap is the framework we would use to close it, so the roadmap is directly actionable rather than generic competitive intelligence you cannot act on.
Sources
- Search Engine Land. (2025). ChatGPT citations favor a small group of domains: Study. searchengineland.com
- Profound. (2025). AI Platform Citation Patterns: How ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, and Perplexity Source Information. tryprofound.com
- Retail Technology Innovation Hub. (2026). The Citation Gap: why ChatGPT cites your competitors but not you. retailtechinnovationhub.com
- Aggarwal, P., Murahari, V., Rajpurohit, T., Kalyan, A., Narasimhan, K., & Deshpande, A. (2023). GEO: Generative Engine Optimization. KDD '24. arXiv:2311.09735
- Google. (2024). Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines. services.google.com
Book Your Free AI Competitor Analysis
Formative Digital, Brantford, Ontario
The analysis is the right first step whether you close the gap yourself or hand it to us. We deliver the written four-engine competitor read inside seven business days, with no follow-up sales pressure and no obligation to continue.